Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 00:05:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46921A646D4267C575234F033619D513BAF2BA4FD986D4BC7CD2998CFE7653EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

I listened twice and wasn't exactly sure what he said, so the other people objecting aren't either. It is not unusual for him to use foul language to describe women, this is a term he uses, so not at all surprising to hear. You can't say it didn't happen because you vote for him.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822342540970147911
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46921A646D4267C575234F033619D513BAF2BA4FD986D4BC7CD2998CFE7653EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1723334706972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182234254097014791146921A646D4267C575234F033619D513BAF2BA4FD986D4BC7CD2998CFE7653EA