Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 20:45:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43FDB5EC98072C83ADE0AAB98181D4A04AE7F1822BF270EA624E439E69401C38
Participant Details

Original Note:

I listened twice and wasn't exactly sure what he said, so the other people objecting aren't either. It is not unusual for him to use foul language to describe women, this is a term he uses, so not at all surprising to hear. You can't say it didn't happen because you vote for him.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822342540970147911
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43FDB5EC98072C83ADE0AAB98181D4A04AE7F1822BF270EA624E439E69401C38
  • createdAtMillis - 1723322715098
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182234254097014791143FDB5EC98072C83ADE0AAB98181D4A04AE7F1822BF270EA624E439E69401C38