Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 22:27:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28BE1F39E04E3ADBFE20AF1028577F2D8C77B44990298377F97F340D4FF936C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

I listened twice and wasn't exactly sure what he said, so the other people objecting aren't either. It is not unusual for him to use foul language to describe women, this is a term he uses, so not at all surprising to hear. You can't say it didn't happen because you vote for him.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822342540970147911
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28BE1F39E04E3ADBFE20AF1028577F2D8C77B44990298377F97F340D4FF936C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1723328874570
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182234254097014791128BE1F39E04E3ADBFE20AF1028577F2D8C77B44990298377F97F340D4FF936C8