Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 21:36:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B9DE2C9F703CA363BBD18C51C6DD08448518E692CFD31B6FED6BC645DFD7374
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the tweet does not claim any of the things the note seems to want it to claim. The note-writer is using CNs to make an argument that does not pertain to any claim made in the tweet itself. That’s not what this is for.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822337356659105859
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B9DE2C9F703CA363BBD18C51C6DD08448518E692CFD31B6FED6BC645DFD7374
  • createdAtMillis - 1723325787842
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18223373566591058591B9DE2C9F703CA363BBD18C51C6DD08448518E692CFD31B6FED6BC645DFD7374