Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 03:44:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E7EC9EF9C1281A9A932F4BCD0604E490E155AA63F6EB7C36509C5926EDB1DAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the tweet does not claim any of the things the note seems to want it to claim. The note-writer is using CNs to make an argument that does not pertain to any claim made in the tweet itself. That’s not what this is for.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822337356659105859
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E7EC9EF9C1281A9A932F4BCD0604E490E155AA63F6EB7C36509C5926EDB1DAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1723347857985
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18223373566591058590E7EC9EF9C1281A9A932F4BCD0604E490E155AA63F6EB7C36509C5926EDB1DAE