Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 21:15:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD0E4CAF95829E04146DF0A320C6FAC5CC3CECAFF8107C6FAF7F2051BCD248CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The headline is not factual. The act (law) did not contain any anti-pedophile language to begin with. The bill didn't remove any such language One revision of the bill attempted to add such unnecessary language. That revision was not included when the bill was signed into law https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tim-walz-pedophile-protection-law/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822294167671673336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD0E4CAF95829E04146DF0A320C6FAC5CC3CECAFF8107C6FAF7F2051BCD248CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1723324516787
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822294167671673336FD0E4CAF95829E04146DF0A320C6FAC5CC3CECAFF8107C6FAF7F2051BCD248CA