Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 23:04:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F37ACD053C07C3745B10566A38DD1C980246CFDC33FD09307F8F0FE196FD4C7A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The headline is not factual. The act (law) did not contain any anti-pedophile language to begin with. The bill didn't remove any such language One revision of the bill attempted to add such unnecessary language. That revision was not included when the bill was signed into law https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tim-walz-pedophile-protection-law/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822294167671673336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F37ACD053C07C3745B10566A38DD1C980246CFDC33FD09307F8F0FE196FD4C7A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723331050262
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822294167671673336F37ACD053C07C3745B10566A38DD1C980246CFDC33FD09307F8F0FE196FD4C7A