Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 19:23:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E36297521F613C07F4D20E7880C88E0342AE788442434F4572DCE0FF729C690
Participant Details

Original Note:

The headline is not factual. The act (law) did not contain any anti-pedophile language to begin with. The bill didn't remove any such language One revision of the bill attempted to add such unnecessary language. That revision was not included when the bill was signed into law https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tim-walz-pedophile-protection-law/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822294167671673336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E36297521F613C07F4D20E7880C88E0342AE788442434F4572DCE0FF729C690
  • createdAtMillis - 1723317826812
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18222941676716733365E36297521F613C07F4D20E7880C88E0342AE788442434F4572DCE0FF729C690