Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 22:10:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21DE9316E9D7D8ED7C30986A8745293F78F1212FE9D0827E15454902930B4E62
Participant Details

Original Note:

The headline is not factual. The act (law) did not contain any anti-pedophile language to begin with. The bill didn't remove any such language One revision of the bill attempted to add such unnecessary language. That revision was not included when the bill was signed into law https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tim-walz-pedophile-protection-law/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822294167671673336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21DE9316E9D7D8ED7C30986A8745293F78F1212FE9D0827E15454902930B4E62
  • createdAtMillis - 1723327839427
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182229416767167333621DE9316E9D7D8ED7C30986A8745293F78F1212FE9D0827E15454902930B4E62