Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 13:52:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F76D4720EB05396C20F6B70FEA9A823262BA90BABCF799FAFE972CC11363A861
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article linked to makes it clear that he was charged as police believed he was "heavily involved" in the riot. He is entitled to defend himself and say he was only there for a look, but that is the defence case, not the reason he was charged. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2n78r4ld7o.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822268259581710831
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F76D4720EB05396C20F6B70FEA9A823262BA90BABCF799FAFE972CC11363A861
  • createdAtMillis - 1723297935893
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822268259581710831F76D4720EB05396C20F6B70FEA9A823262BA90BABCF799FAFE972CC11363A861