Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 16:57:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 464BA0E5DA9B03483CAA36F54FF397789173FE378EBF4727B52C7964DDFBA4F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article linked to makes it clear that he was charged as police believed he was "heavily involved" in the riot. He is entitled to defend himself and say he was only there for a look, but that is the defence case, not the reason he was charged. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2n78r4ld7o.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822268259581710831
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 464BA0E5DA9B03483CAA36F54FF397789173FE378EBF4727B52C7964DDFBA4F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723309043440
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1822268259581710831464BA0E5DA9B03483CAA36F54FF397789173FE378EBF4727B52C7964DDFBA4F4