Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 13:45:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5DDBF09B965792E66A498F1E5BC2BB568031D6C4135A2D3F98D09317133B5EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article doesn’t claim that the bill protected pedophiles. It just claims anti pedophile language was removed. Essentially the claim is that the bill is neutral when it comes to pedophiles.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822248721779752972
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D5DDBF09B965792E66A498F1E5BC2BB568031D6C4135A2D3F98D09317133B5EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1723297526796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822248721779752972D5DDBF09B965792E66A498F1E5BC2BB568031D6C4135A2D3F98D09317133B5EA