Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 22:30:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7F445ED400A8B3836F6B8A43DAFEF8F6773E9E64F1C60EA6B630E7EEAC7A768
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article doesn’t claim that the bill protected pedophiles. It just claims anti pedophile language was removed. Essentially the claim is that the bill is neutral when it comes to pedophiles.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822248721779752972
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B7F445ED400A8B3836F6B8A43DAFEF8F6773E9E64F1C60EA6B630E7EEAC7A768
  • createdAtMillis - 1723329027318
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822248721779752972B7F445ED400A8B3836F6B8A43DAFEF8F6773E9E64F1C60EA6B630E7EEAC7A768