Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 12:38:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A54F1E09C04F6ABD89204A6FD9FA2B8464F7E88E6512F6858BE388A8839B9C2C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article doesn’t claim that the bill protected pedophiles. It just claims anti pedophile language was removed. Essentially the claim is that the bill is neutral when it comes to pedophiles.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822248721779752972
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A54F1E09C04F6ABD89204A6FD9FA2B8464F7E88E6512F6858BE388A8839B9C2C
  • createdAtMillis - 1723293517866
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822248721779752972A54F1E09C04F6ABD89204A6FD9FA2B8464F7E88E6512F6858BE388A8839B9C2C