Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 12:31:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A00F13F6B43DC09757C7E9BC302D65BA12E1C7586C6B728C50BE1AC0C50431E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article doesn’t claim that the bill protected pedophiles. It just claims anti pedophile language was removed. Essentially the claim is that the bill is neutral when it comes to pedophiles.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822248721779752972
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A00F13F6B43DC09757C7E9BC302D65BA12E1C7586C6B728C50BE1AC0C50431E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1723293109065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822248721779752972A00F13F6B43DC09757C7E9BC302D65BA12E1C7586C6B728C50BE1AC0C50431E3