Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 12:39:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C9C0E244B3E3CCC2F7EB56CE9D264A7ED2E6E8CFC119919C6B03FDB538494FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article doesn’t claim that the bill protected pedophiles. It just claims anti pedophile language was removed. Essentially the claim is that the bill is neutral when it comes to pedophiles.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822248721779752972
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C9C0E244B3E3CCC2F7EB56CE9D264A7ED2E6E8CFC119919C6B03FDB538494FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1723293583593
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18222487217797529724C9C0E244B3E3CCC2F7EB56CE9D264A7ED2E6E8CFC119919C6B03FDB538494FD