Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 22:38:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A35BAC4E43DED41E9515FDC7C2EE2D486ED488F2B445316274DFAD424DC5932
Participant Details

Original Note:

The journal IS peer reviwed, see journal policy https://mail.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/about

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822245005919948946
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A35BAC4E43DED41E9515FDC7C2EE2D486ED488F2B445316274DFAD424DC5932
  • createdAtMillis - 1723329489837
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18222450059199489460A35BAC4E43DED41E9515FDC7C2EE2D486ED488F2B445316274DFAD424DC5932