Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 11:56:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DEEF7639056035FA332E0545E5E292BAB36CFBB78EA9FD00E53CA9C6EE6391C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - About the Imane Khelif case, Dawkins clearly states: “my opinion is open to civilised argument”. That said the CNs proposed above are missing the key point of Dawkin’s post which is Facebook’s suppression of such opinion and discussion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822238570741899297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DEEF7639056035FA332E0545E5E292BAB36CFBB78EA9FD00E53CA9C6EE6391C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1723290984674
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822238570741899297DEEF7639056035FA332E0545E5E292BAB36CFBB78EA9FD00E53CA9C6EE6391C1