Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 14:33:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B42E1CEC5882CA52F4018601CC1F85685F8FBF14727FFA3A33AC43D47805F004
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - About the Imane Khelif case, Dawkins clearly states: “my opinion is open to civilised argument”. That said the CNs proposed above are missing the key point of Dawkin’s post which is Facebook’s suppression of such opinion and discussion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822238570741899297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B42E1CEC5882CA52F4018601CC1F85685F8FBF14727FFA3A33AC43D47805F004
  • createdAtMillis - 1723300437547
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822238570741899297B42E1CEC5882CA52F4018601CC1F85685F8FBF14727FFA3A33AC43D47805F004