Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 18:02:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83717E191BBD1919C4B4B005655080733713404A2C2954581C7A712859907BD4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - About the Imane Khelif case, Dawkins clearly states: “my opinion is open to civilised argument”. That said the CNs proposed above are missing the key point of Dawkin’s post which is Facebook’s suppression of such opinion and discussion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822238570741899297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83717E191BBD1919C4B4B005655080733713404A2C2954581C7A712859907BD4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723312936343
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182223857074189929783717E191BBD1919C4B4B005655080733713404A2C2954581C7A712859907BD4