Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 12:23:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 436668BBFD3EFEA645D84CE7E07087E16D6AC6B0A2E29618ED5C64EEF6C9687C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - About the Imane Khelif case, Dawkins clearly states: “my opinion is open to civilised argument”. That said the CNs proposed above are missing the key point of Dawkin’s post which is Facebook’s suppression of such opinion and discussion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822238570741899297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 436668BBFD3EFEA645D84CE7E07087E16D6AC6B0A2E29618ED5C64EEF6C9687C
  • createdAtMillis - 1723292584452
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822238570741899297436668BBFD3EFEA645D84CE7E07087E16D6AC6B0A2E29618ED5C64EEF6C9687C