Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 11:54:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 403BBEB071F824120ABB174904C6AB79611E48511171D511A4494373B159FB59
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - About the Imane Khelif case, Dawkins clearly states: “my opinion is open to civilised argument”. That said the CNs proposed above are missing the key point of Dawkin’s post which is Facebook’s suppression of such opinion and discussion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822238570741899297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 403BBEB071F824120ABB174904C6AB79611E48511171D511A4494373B159FB59
  • createdAtMillis - 1723290897646
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822238570741899297403BBEB071F824120ABB174904C6AB79611E48511171D511A4494373B159FB59