Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 09:26:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D29F1007ADD32ECAF11ADDB461AA04B46CB37BE8A460C9BCAAC67CA65910201A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post is misleading. The operative word is "for". The conviction reported on was in fact not for posting on social media per se, but inciting violence against racial minorities. If the OP used e.g. "following", instead of "for", no note would be necessary. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/aug/09/two-men-jailed-for-social-media-posts-that-stirred-up-far-right-violence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822233624424399011
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D29F1007ADD32ECAF11ADDB461AA04B46CB37BE8A460C9BCAAC67CA65910201A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723368364519
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822233624424399011D29F1007ADD32ECAF11ADDB461AA04B46CB37BE8A460C9BCAAC67CA65910201A