Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 14:51:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 479303D24B9932359BA7D4F10D47243FE5DE417BEDA1D909963F99EC94C011F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post is misleading. The operative word is "for". The conviction reported on was in fact not for posting on social media per se, but inciting violence against racial minorities. If the OP used e.g. "following", instead of "for", no note would be necessary. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/aug/09/two-men-jailed-for-social-media-posts-that-stirred-up-far-right-violence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822233624424399011
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 479303D24B9932359BA7D4F10D47243FE5DE417BEDA1D909963F99EC94C011F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723301477577
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822233624424399011479303D24B9932359BA7D4F10D47243FE5DE417BEDA1D909963F99EC94C011F4