Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 15:05:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E600E97EF2FA157B26EAE1577C8087B55D10C27E441226AADCBF809A9E0D1098
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 1) Source doesn’t support note that the agency that took the test is unreliable. 2) Even if true that it’s unreliable, Khalif is still XY undisputed, as she or anyone speaking on her behalf has in fact never disputed the claim or claimed she is XX.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822199558073430138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E600E97EF2FA157B26EAE1577C8087B55D10C27E441226AADCBF809A9E0D1098
  • createdAtMillis - 1723302307582
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822199558073430138E600E97EF2FA157B26EAE1577C8087B55D10C27E441226AADCBF809A9E0D1098