Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 09:31:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 289FE99E712ED1FCEED525CC9DB93B1F6C2AFEEFC480F87DCB14B004C52A565D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 1) Source doesn’t support note that the agency that took the test is unreliable. 2) Even if true that it’s unreliable, Khalif is still XY undisputed, as she or anyone speaking on her behalf has in fact never disputed the claim or claimed she is XX.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822199558073430138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 289FE99E712ED1FCEED525CC9DB93B1F6C2AFEEFC480F87DCB14B004C52A565D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723282319621
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822199558073430138289FE99E712ED1FCEED525CC9DB93B1F6C2AFEEFC480F87DCB14B004C52A565D