Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 11:32:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16F50C00DE8655006F20B0C72E5488A1E333EF968A80EA03E7C16C433453DD24
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 1) Source doesn’t support note that the agency that took the test is unreliable. 2) Even if true that it’s unreliable, Khalif is still XY undisputed, as she or anyone speaking on her behalf has in fact never disputed the claim or claimed she is XX.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822199558073430138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16F50C00DE8655006F20B0C72E5488A1E333EF968A80EA03E7C16C433453DD24
  • createdAtMillis - 1723289537398
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182219955807343013816F50C00DE8655006F20B0C72E5488A1E333EF968A80EA03E7C16C433453DD24