Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 11:57:17 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 70710F2F12F11E5B77578073CC2CA26F0F246D03929B1052EC922693787FD516
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cornell law link about US free speech law, used to support the claim that the cat is not describing free speech, itself includes the Brandenburg v Ohio caveat of incitement. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/freedom_of_speech

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822147624662712469
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 70710F2F12F11E5B77578073CC2CA26F0F246D03929B1052EC922693787FD516
  • createdAtMillis - 1723291037189
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182214762466271246970710F2F12F11E5B77578073CC2CA26F0F246D03929B1052EC922693787FD516