Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 17:31:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3ED55F57AD89FB55A77BE5740B430ACD2B844BE32F1352F3B909E1D3CEE2F325
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cornell law link about US free speech law, used to support the claim that the cat is not describing free speech, itself includes the Brandenburg v Ohio caveat of incitement. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/freedom_of_speech

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822147624662712469
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3ED55F57AD89FB55A77BE5740B430ACD2B844BE32F1352F3B909E1D3CEE2F325
  • createdAtMillis - 1723311116104
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18221476246627124693ED55F57AD89FB55A77BE5740B430ACD2B844BE32F1352F3B909E1D3CEE2F325