Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 22:24:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F8BEBED7A8588A9AF7A6C4855A1E2C6C2CAD82C8FE513B3B281D3AD6F02FC042
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - none of the articles provided refute the claim that the boxer in question has XY chromosomes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822031399970377769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F8BEBED7A8588A9AF7A6C4855A1E2C6C2CAD82C8FE513B3B281D3AD6F02FC042
  • createdAtMillis - 1723587843486
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822031399970377769F8BEBED7A8588A9AF7A6C4855A1E2C6C2CAD82C8FE513B3B281D3AD6F02FC042