Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 02:30:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B98D34C1FAB59B54050FA409446590F3F2A1DE8422C1CEAC7ABB5DE65975C2DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le doute et la polémique ne peut s'arrêter que si le CIO refait un test ADN, il s'y refuse pour des raisons qu'il ne donne pas. il est donc normal que les concourants demandent plus de transparence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822013317260759303
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B98D34C1FAB59B54050FA409446590F3F2A1DE8422C1CEAC7ABB5DE65975C2DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1723257015252
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822013317260759303B98D34C1FAB59B54050FA409446590F3F2A1DE8422C1CEAC7ABB5DE65975C2DB