Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 22:37:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35A16EE9FC4A8B3504B474CB2AD34D79820122E16C98DEC1F40998662EED4D4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le doute et la polémique ne peut s'arrêter que si le CIO refait un test ADN, il s'y refuse pour des raisons qu'il ne donne pas. il est donc normal que les concourants demandent plus de transparence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822013317260759303
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35A16EE9FC4A8B3504B474CB2AD34D79820122E16C98DEC1F40998662EED4D4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1723243076942
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182201331726075930335A16EE9FC4A8B3504B474CB2AD34D79820122E16C98DEC1F40998662EED4D4C