Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-21 18:29:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F824430BCEFE1E4BF60E7B89F7781CD9652432661C9591BE626E4046C462D7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le doute et la polémique ne peut s'arrêter que si le CIO refait un test ADN, il s'y refuse pour des raisons qu'il ne donne pas. il est donc normal que les concourants demandent plus de transparence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822013317260759303
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F824430BCEFE1E4BF60E7B89F7781CD9652432661C9591BE626E4046C462D7E
  • createdAtMillis - 1724264958890
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18220133172607593032F824430BCEFE1E4BF60E7B89F7781CD9652432661C9591BE626E4046C462D7E