Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-23 18:04:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 27277033F5C7904A7DB412306F262E5B3E1010B7F41EB8B3DAA65C31A316D430
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le doute et la polémique ne peut s'arrêter que si le CIO refait un test ADN, il s'y refuse pour des raisons qu'il ne donne pas. il est donc normal que les concourants demandent plus de transparence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822013317260759303
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 27277033F5C7904A7DB412306F262E5B3E1010B7F41EB8B3DAA65C31A316D430
  • createdAtMillis - 1724436272796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182201331726075930327277033F5C7904A7DB412306F262E5B3E1010B7F41EB8B3DAA65C31A316D430