Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 13:40:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 19C99014A287B37E0A1CDAFC8A35C1ED6BD276D5502AE2FCEABBA39B4BB9CE75
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le doute et la polémique ne peut s'arrêter que si le CIO refait un test ADN, il s'y refuse pour des raisons qu'il ne donne pas. il est donc normal que les concourants demandent plus de transparence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822013317260759303
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 19C99014A287B37E0A1CDAFC8A35C1ED6BD276D5502AE2FCEABBA39B4BB9CE75
  • createdAtMillis - 1723470003589
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182201331726075930319C99014A287B37E0A1CDAFC8A35C1ED6BD276D5502AE2FCEABBA39B4BB9CE75