Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-10 03:06:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CBC8592ECD6932FA0188C354FA91BDBAB79E6DE87507404AC10041F7F0650DAB
Participant Details
Original Note:
All links provided as rebuttal’s are 2-3 yrs ago while the research is from 7/2024. There is no supporting data to prove this is from unclean slides either, only a link on how to clean. Lastly, what’s the proof that this is not a peer reviewed journal? https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/mar/12/facebook-posts/no-covid-19-vaccines-do-not-contain-nanoparticles-/ https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/oct/28/seven-spooky-things-people-say-are-covid-19-vaccin/ https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/life-science/cell-analysis/cell-analysis-learning-center/molecular-probes-school-of-fluorescence/imaging-basics/protocols-troubleshooting/protocols/mounting-coverslips.html#:~:text=Blot%20excess%20buffer%20or%20solvent,the%20salt%20residue%20before%20imaging https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-mrna-vaccine-nanotech-390958734912
All Note Details