Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 21:57:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FB5434E9052D1E835B3761171528937283121DF549961D3DFFC4FAF2A3B8ECF3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Article 10 of the Human rights act may have to be considered by the court, which is not mentioned in many of the ‘notes’ Article 10 entrenched the right of freedom of expression across states ! To tweet something incorrect by accident is not against the law the UK agreed https://fra.europa.eu/en/law-reference/european-convention-human-rights-article-10

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821892688993550388
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FB5434E9052D1E835B3761171528937283121DF549961D3DFFC4FAF2A3B8ECF3
  • createdAtMillis - 1723240667159
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821892688993550388FB5434E9052D1E835B3761171528937283121DF549961D3DFFC4FAF2A3B8ECF3