Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 15:18:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0B79BEF02653D9218C0CD67D2421FB542F4B0FE5C8A27794413AE752C6573E2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Article 10 of the Human rights act may have to be considered by the court, which is not mentioned in many of the ‘notes’ Article 10 entrenched the right of freedom of expression across states ! To tweet something incorrect by accident is not against the law the UK agreed https://fra.europa.eu/en/law-reference/european-convention-human-rights-article-10

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821892688993550388
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0B79BEF02653D9218C0CD67D2421FB542F4B0FE5C8A27794413AE752C6573E2
  • createdAtMillis - 1723216732189
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1821892688993550388D0B79BEF02653D9218C0CD67D2421FB542F4B0FE5C8A27794413AE752C6573E2