Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 20:20:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA0DB573717446430CF47BD677D2ACD6B4AD10C5D106346EAA492E771C55D505
Participant Details

Original Note:

Article 10 of the Human rights act may have to be considered by the court, which is not mentioned in many of the ‘notes’ Article 10 entrenched the right of freedom of expression across states ! To tweet something incorrect by accident is not against the law the UK agreed https://fra.europa.eu/en/law-reference/european-convention-human-rights-article-10

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821892688993550388
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA0DB573717446430CF47BD677D2ACD6B4AD10C5D106346EAA492E771C55D505
  • createdAtMillis - 1723407639291
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821892688993550388CA0DB573717446430CF47BD677D2ACD6B4AD10C5D106346EAA492E771C55D505