Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 05:26:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81BA988099B4101633DF958E6BCBC9A1E616B6FFB56E2F5FBE693F1E258976F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Article 10 of the Human rights act may have to be considered by the court, which is not mentioned in many of the ‘notes’ Article 10 entrenched the right of freedom of expression across states ! To tweet something incorrect by accident is not against the law the UK agreed https://fra.europa.eu/en/law-reference/european-convention-human-rights-article-10

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821892688993550388
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 81BA988099B4101633DF958E6BCBC9A1E616B6FFB56E2F5FBE693F1E258976F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1723267595156
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182189268899355038881BA988099B4101633DF958E6BCBC9A1E616B6FFB56E2F5FBE693F1E258976F9