Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 00:24:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E325E312EB966761BFDF34E830499DCE7654329BD72B9FB1B3FCAF6DBE5F72A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nota irrelevante. 1) É uma coluna de opinião 2) O acórdão do TCU é de 2016 e não retroage. Portanto todos os presentes de todos os presidentes anteriores não são afetados. Não utilize as notas para tentar denegrir o político que você não gosta. Não é essa a função .

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821886768058130638
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E325E312EB966761BFDF34E830499DCE7654329BD72B9FB1B3FCAF6DBE5F72A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723249491256
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18218867680581306384E325E312EB966761BFDF34E830499DCE7654329BD72B9FB1B3FCAF6DBE5F72A