Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 21:29:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EBC92BB4DA2A60D3F676CCF204DA9ECB76ECA90C35B2D81B9B92A34388E884F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The reproduced citement contains a factual error. ICJ did no "ruling" in that case but published an "advisory opinion" Details can be found at the page of the ICJ itself https://www.icj-cij.org/node/204176

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821886448536060244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EBC92BB4DA2A60D3F676CCF204DA9ECB76ECA90C35B2D81B9B92A34388E884F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1723238999813
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1821886448536060244EBC92BB4DA2A60D3F676CCF204DA9ECB76ECA90C35B2D81B9B92A34388E884F1