Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 18:50:03 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 755155C57ADAF9281C3AA00E92FBECA16F7352FA33C1AC53BEA6B4148CC4869B
Participant Details

Original Note:

La présentation est trompeuse et compare l'avant et l’arrière du bâtiment. Le bâtiment non plus détruit comme dit après. la façade avant va être restaurée a l'identique et l'arrière sans importance architectural sera revêtu de la résille comme expliqué dans les tweets suivants https://x.com/RaveaudGilles/status/1821776488745541988

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821845314518597704
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 755155C57ADAF9281C3AA00E92FBECA16F7352FA33C1AC53BEA6B4148CC4869B
  • createdAtMillis - 1723229403400
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821845314518597704755155C57ADAF9281C3AA00E92FBECA16F7352FA33C1AC53BEA6B4148CC4869B