Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 09:40:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 991936281F500996886EE32408A51F497488224E8F2279A6E362A8FC1F865BC4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Max Davie misstated the objectives and observations of the Cass Review, as well as misreading underlying data used to inform its findings. A point-by-point correction can be found here: https://x.com/benryanwriter/status/1821653395096076619?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821835950793580970
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 991936281F500996886EE32408A51F497488224E8F2279A6E362A8FC1F865BC4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723196445620
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821835950793580970991936281F500996886EE32408A51F497488224E8F2279A6E362A8FC1F865BC4