Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 06:34:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73B82CBB5D5031FA61D9BCA50C10F108F61150A9B85A85E1D4DC15A801418089
Participant Details

Original Note:

See followup thread refuting claims made by sources in the proposed note: https://x.com/DustyDeevers/status/1821643054144799149 It's fair to say the bill does not make pedophiles a protected class, but it could open the door for courts to do so by removing the language that prohibited such an interpretation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821795510803431716
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73B82CBB5D5031FA61D9BCA50C10F108F61150A9B85A85E1D4DC15A801418089
  • createdAtMillis - 1723185273644
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182179551080343171673B82CBB5D5031FA61D9BCA50C10F108F61150A9B85A85E1D4DC15A801418089