Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 06:06:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 162AA6EE9EC38C2B307752E2A5D9F4677C42BC9D6D0D68D846508C9FF8AABC9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

See followup thread refuting claims made by sources in the proposed note: https://x.com/DustyDeevers/status/1821643054144799149 It's fair to say the bill does not make pedophiles a protected class, but it could open the door for courts to do so by removing the language that prohibited such an interpretation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821795510803431716
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 162AA6EE9EC38C2B307752E2A5D9F4677C42BC9D6D0D68D846508C9FF8AABC9F
  • createdAtMillis - 1723269993438
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821795510803431716162AA6EE9EC38C2B307752E2A5D9F4677C42BC9D6D0D68D846508C9FF8AABC9F