Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 15:05:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE65E12531C8B953C07C8AE17E18B104DFBE0A88F03DDD9B9BCE49142B4E297F
Participant Details

Original Note:

חוות דעת במשפט פלילי הגיעה לטובת ההגנה. אז מה? חוו"ד של התביעה היא על ידי רופא שפועל לטובת התביעה. ולשים טוויט את בן כספית בתור מקור זה לא רציני.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821755477484503151
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE65E12531C8B953C07C8AE17E18B104DFBE0A88F03DDD9B9BCE49142B4E297F
  • createdAtMillis - 1723302354832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821755477484503151EE65E12531C8B953C07C8AE17E18B104DFBE0A88F03DDD9B9BCE49142B4E297F