Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-29 08:29:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4486883C0007A85E089D3436F0EA9BDC30C7569D472DDE90D016CD6F18F2D7B
Participant Details

Original Note:

חוות דעת במשפט פלילי הגיעה לטובת ההגנה. אז מה? חוו"ד של התביעה היא על ידי רופא שפועל לטובת התביעה. ולשים טוויט את בן כספית בתור מקור זה לא רציני.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821755477484503151
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4486883C0007A85E089D3436F0EA9BDC30C7569D472DDE90D016CD6F18F2D7B
  • createdAtMillis - 1724920169020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821755477484503151D4486883C0007A85E089D3436F0EA9BDC30C7569D472DDE90D016CD6F18F2D7B