Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 05:42:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95AFF705DEF22889105778EA39A6F9B4E9313D5BD7D710EA0D9279415D32A21D
Participant Details

Original Note:

חוות דעת במשפט פלילי הגיעה לטובת ההגנה. אז מה? חוו"ד של התביעה היא על ידי רופא שפועל לטובת התביעה. ולשים טוויט את בן כספית בתור מקור זה לא רציני.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821755477484503151
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95AFF705DEF22889105778EA39A6F9B4E9313D5BD7D710EA0D9279415D32A21D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723182154042
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182175547748450315195AFF705DEF22889105778EA39A6F9B4E9313D5BD7D710EA0D9279415D32A21D