Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 10:54:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60C79F791A410F772AE616A950D2520EB111ADAAF139E95EFF03A396A7141263
Participant Details

Original Note:

חוות דעת במשפט פלילי הגיעה לטובת ההגנה. אז מה? חוו"ד של התביעה היא על ידי רופא שפועל לטובת התביעה. ולשים טוויט את בן כספית בתור מקור זה לא רציני.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821755477484503151
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60C79F791A410F772AE616A950D2520EB111ADAAF139E95EFF03A396A7141263
  • createdAtMillis - 1723200850368
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182175547748450315160C79F791A410F772AE616A950D2520EB111ADAAF139E95EFF03A396A7141263